<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon&#8217;s SD600: The perfect wedding camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/</link>
	<description>Rakesh\</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardik</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>hardik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I have used both sd700 and sd800, sd800 is superb with its wide zoom lense. Image stablization also functions well. overall i m quite happy with sd800</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both sd700 and sd800, sd800 is superb with its wide zoom lense. Image stablization also functions well. overall i m quite happy with sd800</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh Agrawal&#38;#8217;s Blog &#38;#187; Ananya at the dinner table the other night</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh Agrawal&#38;#8217;s Blog &#38;#187; Ananya at the dinner table the other night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-800</guid>
		<description>[...] (video shot with my new Canon SD600 and uploaded using Google Video) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (video shot with my new Canon SD600 and uploaded using Google Video) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh Agrawal&#38;#8217;s Blog &#38;#187; Saturday, February 3, 2007: A Photologue</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh Agrawal&#38;#8217;s Blog &#38;#187; Saturday, February 3, 2007: A Photologue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-799</guid>
		<description>[...] (all photos taken with my new Canon SD600) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (all photos taken with my new Canon SD600) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakesh</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-798</guid>
		<description>I used it earlier tonight and I haven&#039;t noticed any red eye problems since I&#039;ve used it.  I know there is a flash mode that reduces red eye but even without that on, with the flash just in automatic mode, it&#039;s been fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used it earlier tonight and I haven&#8217;t noticed any red eye problems since I&#8217;ve used it.  I know there is a flash mode that reduces red eye but even without that on, with the flash just in automatic mode, it&#8217;s been fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Fourputt</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Fourputt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-797</guid>
		<description>I have the SD630 model and just love it.   Great quality at a fair price.

Get a little red eye in the photos once in a while but that&#039;s about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the SD630 model and just love it.   Great quality at a fair price.</p>
<p>Get a little red eye in the photos once in a while but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjit Mathoda</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/03/canons-sd600-the-perfect-wedding-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjit Mathoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=199#comment-796</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of getting exactly the same camera for the same reasons (cost, compact, large LCD).  Does it have a red eye problem?  The Canon SD20 does, but I think that might be because the SD20 is so small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of getting exactly the same camera for the same reasons (cost, compact, large LCD).  Does it have a red eye problem?  The Canon SD20 does, but I think that might be because the SD20 is so small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

