http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/13/photos-of-my-second-blurb-order/ Rakesh\ Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:21:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/13/photos-of-my-second-blurb-order/comment-page-1/#comment-823 tlccreates Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:14:53 +0000 http://rake.sh/blog/?p=223#comment-823 Thank you soooo much for this wonderful description of your Blurb books. I am working on a project and was wondering about the softcover versions since I will be ordering multiple copies. Based on your recommendation and photos I will definately order the hardcover. Thank you again Thank you soooo much for this wonderful description of your Blurb books. I am working on a project and was wondering about the softcover versions since I will be ordering multiple copies. Based on your recommendation and photos I will definately order the hardcover. Thank you again

]]> http://rake.sh/blog/2007/02/13/photos-of-my-second-blurb-order/comment-page-1/#comment-822 Rakesh Agrawal’s Blog » Blurb: soft cover versus hard cover Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:01:03 +0000 http://rake.sh/blog/?p=223#comment-822 [...] As I mentioned here on my blog last week, I had Blurb print the same book for me as a soft cover and as a hard cover and while I loved the hard cover, I wasn’t so excited about the soft cover. I thought the only difference between the two books would be the quality of the covers. But actually, the print quality of every page of the hard cover was better than that of the soft cover. I had a friend ask me more about the quality difference so I went and scanned one of the same pages from each: [...] [...] As I mentioned here on my blog last week, I had Blurb print the same book for me as a soft cover and as a hard cover and while I loved the hard cover, I wasn’t so excited about the soft cover. I thought the only difference between the two books would be the quality of the covers. But actually, the print quality of every page of the hard cover was better than that of the soft cover. I had a friend ask me more about the quality difference so I went and scanned one of the same pages from each: [...]

]]>