<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing the Palm Treo 680 vs. the Palm Treo Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rake.sh/blog/2008/11/28/comparing-the-palm-treo-680-vs-the-palm-treo-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2008/11/28/comparing-the-palm-treo-680-vs-the-palm-treo-pro/</link>
	<description>Rakesh\</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://rake.sh/blog/2008/11/28/comparing-the-palm-treo-680-vs-the-palm-treo-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-3955</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rake.sh/blog/?p=336#comment-3955</guid>
		<description>Of course the 680 is Palm OS and Treo PRO is WinMo. So there&#039;d be an adjustment either way. And unfortunately there&#039;s no good deals on the PRO since it&#039;s not carrier subsidized. Can I tempt you with a Blackberry Curve instead? Or maybe a Samsung Blackjack 3 (EPIX, WinMo).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the 680 is Palm OS and Treo PRO is WinMo. So there&#8217;d be an adjustment either way. And unfortunately there&#8217;s no good deals on the PRO since it&#8217;s not carrier subsidized. Can I tempt you with a Blackberry Curve instead? Or maybe a Samsung Blackjack 3 (EPIX, WinMo).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

