Author: rakesh

I had lunch today with Terence Fontaine, deputy chief of staff for Houston’s Mayor Bill White and I learned that Houston is in full swing, pursuing setting up a municipal wi-fi. After I got back from lunch and did a little bit of research, I realized that I’ve just been out of the loop and that people have been talking about this for at least the past couple of months. Exciting news! So the city appears to be taking bids now and I’ve heard that Google is one of the bidders so who knows… maybe WiFi in Houston will even be free.

After going through my fourth or fifth Microsoft Exchange crash and countless Outlook problems (after 3 years!), I decided that I had had enough. For a little over a month, I’ve been using Gmail as my primary client for e-mail — for work e-mail, for personal e-mail and everything in between. So far I love it, though I’ve discovered that there are also a few things that make it undesirable. Read on for the details…

The Setup

First of all, how was this even possible? Simple, I have all my different email accounts forward to my gmail account. Then I’m using Gmail’s “accounts” feature so that when I reply to messages sent to rakesh at agrawal.org, the message is sent by “[email protected] on behalf of [rakesh at agrawal.org]” so that when the recipient replies, they are replying to rakesh at agrawal.org and not [email protected]. Basically, it does a decent (but not great — see below) job of making it look like the emails I’m sending are coming from something other than my gmail address. And it switches the “from” address based on which account the incoming address on a message matches so which account is being used is pretty seamless to me.

The Benefits

For me, there have been countless benefits of running email in the network cloud and not on a local client on my PC. Let me count the ways…

– No more crash-prone exchange server or outlook clients: Hey, maybe it was just me (or our network admin) but exchange and outlook were always crashing on me. And email is such a “mission critical” thing for me, this was completely unacceptable. This is really what pushed me into this experiment. With Gmail, I can actually spend all of my time using email rather than spending a disproportionate amount of my time troubleshooting email.

– Access from literally any computing device with Internet access: I don’t need a client installed nor do I need to VPN into my office anymore to access all of my new messages and archived messages. Gmail is accessible from pretty much any web browser. Case in point: I accompanied my Mom to a doctor’s office a couple of weeks ago and the room that we were in happened to have this wall-mounted PC with a web browser and an Internet connection. What did I do while waiting for the Doctor to come in? Why, whittle away my inbox of course using Gmail!

– Gmail Mobile (m.gmail.com): The mobile version of Gmail is indispensible for me, though it’s missing some features (see below). I can not only check for new messages from wherever I am (using my unlocked Cingular 2125 phone) but I can search my massive collection of archived messages. Mailing a package to a friend and need the address that he sent me? No problem, I’ve got the mobile version of Gmail. An interesting thing that I hadn’t expected is that I even end up using the mobile version of Gmail around the house and other places where PCs are easily at hand just because I always have my phone with me (maybe this is just because I’m such an e-mail addict :-)) The other nice thing about Gmail Mobile is that it’s fully synced with my actual inbox — so if I archive something, I don’t have to archive it again in my actual inbox.

– reliable and effective search: With Outlook, I was always a big fan of Lookout (a search tool that was acquired by Microsoft shortly after I discovered it) — but as a bolt-on piece to Outlook it delivered inconsistent performance. Specifically, it seemed to periodically disappear and stop running and I’d have to uninstall and reinstall (and re-index!). With Gmail, the search is just there and it just works. Always (well, almost… see below :-)).

– interface is simple, uncluttered: I feel like I’m a lot more efficient in Gmail, though I haven’t actually benchmarked this. Labels and archiving are the perfect organization paradigms for me. I had already moved to an “archive” model in Outlook (with Lookout as my on-the-fly folder generation tool) so archiving made perfect sense to me in Gmail. Conversations are also a god-send. I think I’d be lost without them now that I’ve been using them so regularly.

– spam filtering is really, really good: We never quite found the right spam filtering tool for Exchange/Outlook at SnapStream. With Gmail the spam filtering is pretty damn good out of the box and I can easily get correct any false positives/negatives myself and that feedback goes back into their spam filtering engine.

– filtering is fast, simple (just like search): Outlook filters suck — I hated sitting there and watching/waiting for Outlook to filter messages. And Outlook filters sometimes worked and sometimes didn’t. Again, maybe I just didn’t have things setup correctly.

– HTML copy/pastes are FAST: This isn’t a huge one, but in Outlook, if I copied a bunch of HTML from my browser and pasted it into a message, it could sometime take a whole minute or two before Outlook became responsive again and my message was ready to send. In Gmail, the HTML pastes instantaneously.

The Downsides

– E-mail accounts functionality could be a lot better: Google’s email “masquerading” is less than perfect. In most e-mail clients, my e-mails look first like they came from [email protected] and it’s only when someone replies is it clear that they were from [my personal address] or [my work address]. This is probably the biggest downside. I’m always concerned that this raises the question in people’s minds about how legit we are (ie “What, their company isn’t big enough to have their own e-mail domain? They use Gmail for email??”). So far I’ve been willing to endure this, but it’s the thing that I probably worry about the most with using Gmail for work. Why not make it so that the emails are “masqueraded” more effectively and there are no links to @gmail.com in the from field? I suspect that the answer here has something to do with emails properly getting through most spam filters out there. I sure hope this problem is solveable and that it’s something the Gmail team is working on!

– m.gmail.com doesn’t support “accounts”: This appears to just be something that the Gmail team hasn’t yet built into mobile, but at the moment when you reply to a message in the mobile version of Gmail, there’s no concept of an “account” — ie all messages sent from m.gmail.com appear to come from your Gmail account. This makes sending emails from my Gmail Mobile account something that I don’t do very often. I emailed Gmail support about this and their reply indicated that this is just a matter of time.

– No offline access: I guess this isn’t true because you can always use Gmail’s POP support to download messages into an offline client, but then I’d lose that notion of having one single email box for everything. And I guess I also haven’t felt the pain as much on this as of late because I haven’t been traveling quite as much as I have in the past.

– It’s not a local application: I know, duh. But there are real disadvantages here — attachments aren’t at your fingertips. Cross-referencing two emails isn’t trivial. In outlook you’d just open up the two messages in two separate windows. In Gmail, I have to get one message open, click on a “open in a new window” button and then find the second message — a bit awkward. In general, running something like this in my browser is a bit strange maybe just because I was used to double clicking an icon and having a separate graphic in my tray for my email client. Now I have to find my Gmail tab from amongst the 10-15 other tabs that I have open at any given point in time.

– Space limitations: So yeah, Gmail offers you 2.8 gigs of storage space (and counting). But I use email A LOT. So I’m using about 2/3 of this right now and at the rate that I’ve been receiving emails, that means that I probably have another 4 months before I top out. Others (like Jason Calacanis) have complained about this. I’m hoping that between now and then Gmail does something to address users like me (yes, I’d be perfectly willing to pay something for more space!)

– Formatting limitations: I sometimes wish I had better control of the presentation of my emails — the Gmail rich text editor control is good, but not great. Certainly not as good as the Microsoft Word editor that I used with Outlook to compose messages. Creating and formatting tables in particular is difficult in Gmail.

– Occasional hiccups of service: After using Gmail for 6 weeks, this happened to me the first time last week. For about 30 minutes, Gmail was unavailable. I’m assuming that this is because Gmail is in beta, but I’m certainly not willing to cut them slack just because they have a “beta” label in their header! 🙂 If this happened more often, it would completely obliterate all of the benefits listed above. Luckily, it doesn’t.

I’m really hoping that the Gmail team comes through and addresses the downsides I’ve listed above and creates something that’s attractive to business users. But even with the solution where it is I’m sticking with Gmail because the benefits far outweigh the downsides for me… and the whole setup, IMO, is much, much better than Microsoft Outlook.

(As an aside, this offline access problem has to be solved at some point by all these companies building rich web-based services. I haven’t seen anyone create a competent solution here, at least not for a mainstream application. Google’s got their Gmail notifier which helps bridge the web-app local-app gap. With Adsense, they’ve been beta-testing a local-app for managing Adwords accounts which I don’t know much about, but would definitely fall into this same category. I wonder if there is a way to make a web-app available offline through the same browser model so there was no issue with needing to create and maintain multiple interfaces. Seems that would be a clean way to go.)

http://www.w3.org/2006/Talks/0419-MWI-Analysts/Overview.html

Great high-level presentation how the W3C is hoping to step in and help the mobile web reach its full potential. They’ve dubbed their efforts in this area the MWI (mobile web initiative). The presentation has some great data on mobile web:
– 63% of handsets are “web-capable”* (1.1B handsets)
– there’s almost an order of magnitude difference between the number of “web caapble” handsets out there and the number of wifi connected laptops (there are a lot more handsets!)
– people spend as much time on the net as they do watching TV (14 hours a week in the U.S.)
– browsing represents the majority of data packets for cell phones
– (if you check out the presentation, slide 20 is a great articulation of the myriad of usability problems with the “mobile web”)

* I suspect that this definition of “web capable” sets a low bar for qualification, just a guess… 🙂

I’ve been wondering whether United 93 would be worth seeing — Xeni seems to say that it is.

Interesting data from Google on mobile phone search queries from this Google paper to be presented at the CHI 2006 conference:

* one in five mobile searches have to do with adult entertainment (about twice the rate non-mobile of adult searches)

* mobile query text strings are as long as the non-mobile query text string

* it takes cell phone users, on average, 60 seconds to enter a search term and get results (wow, that’s long! I think I’m a bit faster, though I’ve never actually timed myself.)

My best mobile search story is when I couldn’t remember the details of a joke I wanted to tell someone and I was able to search for it and find it in the first page of results on Google Mobile (it was a long query string: “golf clubs dessert island joke”).

“The truth is, it is still an open question whether the growth of cannibalism around the world is due to the blogosphere”

Funny article from Anil Dash.

I was recently gifted a fancy coffee machine by my parents — a Nestle Nespresso machine. It’s a razor – razor blade business model (though they definitely don’t send you a free “razor” when you turn 18, this razor is expensive!). You buy a Nespresso machine and then you buy coffee capsules for it from them for $0.49 / piece. I don’t know how this compares pricewise to the more traditional, less-yuppee coffee grounds approach to making coffee, but the nespresso system is clean and fast and the coffee is good and on price, it sure beats daily $4.00 cups of cappuccino / espresso at Starbucks. So I’m generally happy with the machine.

But I had to make a quick posting about their website. It’s really, really bad. I’ve used it twice. Both times I’ve been completely bewildered when trying to buy the coffee capsules. First, they make it so you can’t buy the things anywhere else (to quote from a 3rd party website, “To make sure Nespresso capsules are the freshest they can be, Nespresso handles all coffee orders through their web site”) and then their site is terribly unusable. Lot of money spent on fancy graphics and animations, cryptic navigation, and who knows what else. Somebody at Nespresso, please, please, please spend some money and hire someone with an eye for usability to redesign your site!!

The coffee machine

$0.49 apiece!

Before I switched over to bloglines from Newsgator for Outlook, I was using this newsgator for Firefox plug-in so I could right click on an RSS feed and subscribe to it in newsgator.  This is something I have been missing since the switchover to bloglines (though on almost every other count, I’ve been happier with bloglines vs. having my blogs in outlook) and now the Google Toolbar v2 (in beta right now) gives this feature back to me with it’s subscribe feature.  Visit anypage configured with an RSS feed and the subscribe button lights up — click it and subscribe yourself to the feed in bloglines (or in any number of other feed readers — see below).