Category: General

I’m reading Yann Martel’s “The Life of Pi” and I just read a brilliant chapter on fear, chapter 56:

I must say a word about fear. It is life’s only true opponent. Only fear can defeat life. It is a clever, treacherous adversary, how well I know. It has no decency, respects no law or convention, shows no mercy. It goes for your weakest spot, which it finds with unerring ease. It begins in your mind, always. One moment you are feeling calm, self-possessed, happy. Then fear, disguised in the garb of mild-mannered doubt, slips into your mind like a spy. Doubt meets disbelief and disbelief tries to push it out. But disbelief is a poorly armed foot soldier. Doubt does away with it with little trouble. You become anxious. Reason comes to do battle for you. You are reassured. Reason is fully equipped with the latest weapons technology. But, to your amazement, despite superior tactics and a number of undeniable victories, reason is laid low. You feel yourself weakening, wavering. Your anxiety becomes dread.

Fear next turns fully to your body, which is already aware that something terribly wrong is going on. Already your lungs have flown away like a bird and your guts have slithered away like a snake. Now your tongue drops dead like an opossum, while your jaw begins to gallop on the spot. Your ears go deaf. Your muscles begin to shiver as if they had malaria and your knees to shake as though they were dancing. Your heart strains too hard, while your sphincter relaxes too much. And so with the rest of your body. Every part of you, in the manner most suited to it, falls apart. Only your eyes work well. They always pay proper attention to fear.

Quickly you make rash decisions. You dismiss your last allies: hope and trust. There, you’ve defeated yourself. Fear, which is but an impression, has triumphed over you.

The matter is difficult to put into words. For fear, real fear, such as shakes you to your foundation, such as you feel when you are brought face to face with your mortal end, nestles in your memory like a gangrene: it seeks to rot everything, even the words with which to speak of it. So you must fight hard to express it. You must fight hard to shine the light of words upon it. Because if you don’t, if your fear becomes a wordless darkness that you avoid, perhaps even manage to forget, you open yourself to further attacks of fear because you never truly fought the opponent who defeated you.

from hugh macleod

Wow, Vonage is really hard-selling their IPO. In the past week, I’ve received two emails, a voicemail (on my Vonage line) and a piece of postal mail from Vonage advertising the customer IPO purchase plan. I also saw the IPO mentioned on slashdot.org. They’ve set aside a pretty significant portion of their IPO shares, something like 15%, for purchase by current customers. It seems that customers are an important part of Vonage generating demand for their IPO. I wonder how they did with their roadshow and with other more sophisticated investors.

I’m personally not that excited about Vonage’s long-term prospects because of the competition that is and will be there in the voice over IP space. Yes, they’ve grown at an incredible rate, have spent tons of money on marketing (for several quarters, they were identified as the #1 advertiser on the Internet, according to the IPO prospectus) and are a well-known brand. But I don’t think they have the differentiation or the DNA, at least not at this point, that they’ll need to survive the onslaught of competition they’re going to face.

I’ve studied this public offering closer than any other in the past so it will be interesting to watch it play out next week.

I had lunch today with Terence Fontaine, deputy chief of staff for Houston’s Mayor Bill White and I learned that Houston is in full swing, pursuing setting up a municipal wi-fi. After I got back from lunch and did a little bit of research, I realized that I’ve just been out of the loop and that people have been talking about this for at least the past couple of months. Exciting news! So the city appears to be taking bids now and I’ve heard that Google is one of the bidders so who knows… maybe WiFi in Houston will even be free.

After going through my fourth or fifth Microsoft Exchange crash and countless Outlook problems (after 3 years!), I decided that I had had enough. For a little over a month, I’ve been using Gmail as my primary client for e-mail — for work e-mail, for personal e-mail and everything in between. So far I love it, though I’ve discovered that there are also a few things that make it undesirable. Read on for the details…

The Setup

First of all, how was this even possible? Simple, I have all my different email accounts forward to my gmail account. Then I’m using Gmail’s “accounts” feature so that when I reply to messages sent to rakesh at agrawal.org, the message is sent by “[email protected] on behalf of [rakesh at agrawal.org]” so that when the recipient replies, they are replying to rakesh at agrawal.org and not [email protected]. Basically, it does a decent (but not great — see below) job of making it look like the emails I’m sending are coming from something other than my gmail address. And it switches the “from” address based on which account the incoming address on a message matches so which account is being used is pretty seamless to me.

The Benefits

For me, there have been countless benefits of running email in the network cloud and not on a local client on my PC. Let me count the ways…

– No more crash-prone exchange server or outlook clients: Hey, maybe it was just me (or our network admin) but exchange and outlook were always crashing on me. And email is such a “mission critical” thing for me, this was completely unacceptable. This is really what pushed me into this experiment. With Gmail, I can actually spend all of my time using email rather than spending a disproportionate amount of my time troubleshooting email.

– Access from literally any computing device with Internet access: I don’t need a client installed nor do I need to VPN into my office anymore to access all of my new messages and archived messages. Gmail is accessible from pretty much any web browser. Case in point: I accompanied my Mom to a doctor’s office a couple of weeks ago and the room that we were in happened to have this wall-mounted PC with a web browser and an Internet connection. What did I do while waiting for the Doctor to come in? Why, whittle away my inbox of course using Gmail!

– Gmail Mobile (m.gmail.com): The mobile version of Gmail is indispensible for me, though it’s missing some features (see below). I can not only check for new messages from wherever I am (using my unlocked Cingular 2125 phone) but I can search my massive collection of archived messages. Mailing a package to a friend and need the address that he sent me? No problem, I’ve got the mobile version of Gmail. An interesting thing that I hadn’t expected is that I even end up using the mobile version of Gmail around the house and other places where PCs are easily at hand just because I always have my phone with me (maybe this is just because I’m such an e-mail addict :-)) The other nice thing about Gmail Mobile is that it’s fully synced with my actual inbox — so if I archive something, I don’t have to archive it again in my actual inbox.

– reliable and effective search: With Outlook, I was always a big fan of Lookout (a search tool that was acquired by Microsoft shortly after I discovered it) — but as a bolt-on piece to Outlook it delivered inconsistent performance. Specifically, it seemed to periodically disappear and stop running and I’d have to uninstall and reinstall (and re-index!). With Gmail, the search is just there and it just works. Always (well, almost… see below :-)).

– interface is simple, uncluttered: I feel like I’m a lot more efficient in Gmail, though I haven’t actually benchmarked this. Labels and archiving are the perfect organization paradigms for me. I had already moved to an “archive” model in Outlook (with Lookout as my on-the-fly folder generation tool) so archiving made perfect sense to me in Gmail. Conversations are also a god-send. I think I’d be lost without them now that I’ve been using them so regularly.

– spam filtering is really, really good: We never quite found the right spam filtering tool for Exchange/Outlook at SnapStream. With Gmail the spam filtering is pretty damn good out of the box and I can easily get correct any false positives/negatives myself and that feedback goes back into their spam filtering engine.

– filtering is fast, simple (just like search): Outlook filters suck — I hated sitting there and watching/waiting for Outlook to filter messages. And Outlook filters sometimes worked and sometimes didn’t. Again, maybe I just didn’t have things setup correctly.

– HTML copy/pastes are FAST: This isn’t a huge one, but in Outlook, if I copied a bunch of HTML from my browser and pasted it into a message, it could sometime take a whole minute or two before Outlook became responsive again and my message was ready to send. In Gmail, the HTML pastes instantaneously.

The Downsides

– E-mail accounts functionality could be a lot better: Google’s email “masquerading” is less than perfect. In most e-mail clients, my e-mails look first like they came from [email protected] and it’s only when someone replies is it clear that they were from [my personal address] or [my work address]. This is probably the biggest downside. I’m always concerned that this raises the question in people’s minds about how legit we are (ie “What, their company isn’t big enough to have their own e-mail domain? They use Gmail for email??”). So far I’ve been willing to endure this, but it’s the thing that I probably worry about the most with using Gmail for work. Why not make it so that the emails are “masqueraded” more effectively and there are no links to @gmail.com in the from field? I suspect that the answer here has something to do with emails properly getting through most spam filters out there. I sure hope this problem is solveable and that it’s something the Gmail team is working on!

– m.gmail.com doesn’t support “accounts”: This appears to just be something that the Gmail team hasn’t yet built into mobile, but at the moment when you reply to a message in the mobile version of Gmail, there’s no concept of an “account” — ie all messages sent from m.gmail.com appear to come from your Gmail account. This makes sending emails from my Gmail Mobile account something that I don’t do very often. I emailed Gmail support about this and their reply indicated that this is just a matter of time.

– No offline access: I guess this isn’t true because you can always use Gmail’s POP support to download messages into an offline client, but then I’d lose that notion of having one single email box for everything. And I guess I also haven’t felt the pain as much on this as of late because I haven’t been traveling quite as much as I have in the past.

– It’s not a local application: I know, duh. But there are real disadvantages here — attachments aren’t at your fingertips. Cross-referencing two emails isn’t trivial. In outlook you’d just open up the two messages in two separate windows. In Gmail, I have to get one message open, click on a “open in a new window” button and then find the second message — a bit awkward. In general, running something like this in my browser is a bit strange maybe just because I was used to double clicking an icon and having a separate graphic in my tray for my email client. Now I have to find my Gmail tab from amongst the 10-15 other tabs that I have open at any given point in time.

– Space limitations: So yeah, Gmail offers you 2.8 gigs of storage space (and counting). But I use email A LOT. So I’m using about 2/3 of this right now and at the rate that I’ve been receiving emails, that means that I probably have another 4 months before I top out. Others (like Jason Calacanis) have complained about this. I’m hoping that between now and then Gmail does something to address users like me (yes, I’d be perfectly willing to pay something for more space!)

– Formatting limitations: I sometimes wish I had better control of the presentation of my emails — the Gmail rich text editor control is good, but not great. Certainly not as good as the Microsoft Word editor that I used with Outlook to compose messages. Creating and formatting tables in particular is difficult in Gmail.

– Occasional hiccups of service: After using Gmail for 6 weeks, this happened to me the first time last week. For about 30 minutes, Gmail was unavailable. I’m assuming that this is because Gmail is in beta, but I’m certainly not willing to cut them slack just because they have a “beta” label in their header! 🙂 If this happened more often, it would completely obliterate all of the benefits listed above. Luckily, it doesn’t.

I’m really hoping that the Gmail team comes through and addresses the downsides I’ve listed above and creates something that’s attractive to business users. But even with the solution where it is I’m sticking with Gmail because the benefits far outweigh the downsides for me… and the whole setup, IMO, is much, much better than Microsoft Outlook.

(As an aside, this offline access problem has to be solved at some point by all these companies building rich web-based services. I haven’t seen anyone create a competent solution here, at least not for a mainstream application. Google’s got their Gmail notifier which helps bridge the web-app local-app gap. With Adsense, they’ve been beta-testing a local-app for managing Adwords accounts which I don’t know much about, but would definitely fall into this same category. I wonder if there is a way to make a web-app available offline through the same browser model so there was no issue with needing to create and maintain multiple interfaces. Seems that would be a clean way to go.)

http://www.w3.org/2006/Talks/0419-MWI-Analysts/Overview.html

Great high-level presentation how the W3C is hoping to step in and help the mobile web reach its full potential. They’ve dubbed their efforts in this area the MWI (mobile web initiative). The presentation has some great data on mobile web:
– 63% of handsets are “web-capable”* (1.1B handsets)
– there’s almost an order of magnitude difference between the number of “web caapble” handsets out there and the number of wifi connected laptops (there are a lot more handsets!)
– people spend as much time on the net as they do watching TV (14 hours a week in the U.S.)
– browsing represents the majority of data packets for cell phones
– (if you check out the presentation, slide 20 is a great articulation of the myriad of usability problems with the “mobile web”)

* I suspect that this definition of “web capable” sets a low bar for qualification, just a guess… 🙂

I’ve been wondering whether United 93 would be worth seeing — Xeni seems to say that it is.

Interesting data from Google on mobile phone search queries from this Google paper to be presented at the CHI 2006 conference:

* one in five mobile searches have to do with adult entertainment (about twice the rate non-mobile of adult searches)

* mobile query text strings are as long as the non-mobile query text string

* it takes cell phone users, on average, 60 seconds to enter a search term and get results (wow, that’s long! I think I’m a bit faster, though I’ve never actually timed myself.)

My best mobile search story is when I couldn’t remember the details of a joke I wanted to tell someone and I was able to search for it and find it in the first page of results on Google Mobile (it was a long query string: “golf clubs dessert island joke”).